BBC Documentary Questions to be asked

The BBC are broadcasting a drama Tuesday 26^th January called Murder Games. It's basically a crusade against the on line gaming community, myself, and the family's attempt to highlight police incompetence and sue two police forces.

The trailer is highly dramatic as you would expect from BBC media. It tells one side of a story which in itself shows intent to create bias. In every story there are two sides and people with any interest should always err on the side of facts rather than media spin and distortion. It's for this reason I posted the Open Letter and this post today pre - broadcast. 

One thing to keep in mind amongst all the spin.  

My real name Lewis Daynes was always used in the online gaming community. Everyone knew me by my real name, I had no alias. Brecks family also knew where I lived. They knew my contact details and phone numbers. This would hardly be  part of the modus operandi of a sinister internet paedophile/ sadistic/ groomer would it? 

Police found not one single item of text or computer evidence of a sexual nature on my devices. This is FACT but the media insist on using sexual connotations in their articles. There is also no evidence to suggest that I said 'I was dying', this is fabrication like so much of what is written and said by media and family. 

This weeks Guardian article contradicts itself so much for example : The mothers version "It was the start of half term and he was staying with his father, but told him he was going to his friend Tom’s to build a new server." The fathers version in the same article "Breck told me he was going to see a friend, I was happy that he was doing something that wasn’t online.".Simply you cannot build a server without going online so that is fabrication.

The father "I’ve been to Daynes’s flat – it’s a dump." The mother "Daynes grotty flat" 

The police photographs actually show a very clean tidy modern flat inside and outside in a very nice residential street. The opposite of what they describe it as. 

Brecks father is not a millionaire, as has been said by the family and media.

Breck said he lived in shared lodgings in London when he left and the mother took up with the new boyfriend. Breck said his mother had to take in lodgers to help pay the mortgage.

It would take too much time to address all the lies and spin.

So by all means watch the program and enjoy it for it's dramatic effect but when it is over ask yourself some questions and take everything with a large pinch of salt.

Some of the contributors of the drama have given two differing versions of events. One to police, one to media. This can be verified by the initial statements. 

Why was Breck's mothers first concern in the 48 hours after hearing about her sons death, to create a website The Breck Foundation, open Facebook/Twitter accounts, open VISA/Paypal payment accounts asking for 'donations'. 

Is this the normal behavior of a grieving mother in the first 48 hours? It was one of many confounding questions asked. Recently she has tried to manipulate this by saying she set it up whilst waiting for the body to be released. It still stands. Why would her first concern in the first 48 hours  whilst still on holiday then returning, to be asking for donations of cash?

Breck's mother has said on record 'the first year after Breck's death was spent in bed unable to get out of it'. 

This is simply untrue. 

For two years she has traveled to and appeared on every possible TV show, Radio show, conference, Tweeted, Facebooked, and taken every opportunity to give her version of events. She has traveled locally and abroad to meetings with various sectors of the media. Why would she lie that she was incapacitated and bed bound for a year?

The police stated to the press that 'Breck was not actually groomed' yet there has been no attempt by the media or family to halt the use of this description, why?

Breck's mother has consistently told the media that she feared for her sons safety because of me. She was in fear of his life. He 'was being groomed by a predator' etc. Is it not then strange that she left Breck and his 11 year old siblings to go on holiday with her current boyfriend thinking some internet predator was stalking him? I told the police Breck's address and they arrived there to find his younger siblings Home Alone and they had to wait with them till Brecks father arrived at the family home?

No photo of Breck was sent to the siblings by me. Why do the media and family continue to insist, against the police chain of evidence that I did? Why do they lie about this easily checked fact?

I will not go into fine detail about what Breck and I were creating computer wise, but anyone who reads the retrieved e mails available on the internet between us when I was in Dubai and Thailand in the two weeks proceeding his death can easily surmise that the fabricated media story is inconsistent with the facts. If I had been this 'grooming predator' intent on killing someone then I could have easily left the scene and used my passport and airline ticket (which was already bought days before, for my next trip abroad in a few days time all able to be checked) and my substantial funds and left the country. One has to ask themselves why then call 999? In fact I could have left the scene and fled to any numerous destinations but I did not. My actions do not fit the profile that has been created by the media and family. 

There is a lot more to say but I will stop now and let this be digested.